Black Hat USA Aug 4-6, Mandalay Bay. Book time with us
Solutions

Put agents where the pain is sharpest.

Soarcery is one Familiar applied to the work that burns out a SOC. State the outcome in plain English, watch it plan before it acts, approve the plan, and let it cast the Spell across your stack. Anything consequential stops at the Seal. Start with a single use case, prove it on your own alerts, then dial up the autonomy as your trust grows.

triage / queue
SOC-4471 phishingat the Seal
SOC-4472 impossible travelauto-closed
SOC-4473 malware beaconcontained
SOC-4474 spam waveauto-closed

Product mock. Demo data.

For the board
Coverage you can defend to the board and the auditor: every case closes with a replayable record of evidence, reasoning, cost, and the named human who sealed each consequential action.
Use case · Alert triage

Triage that thinks.

Most alerts are noise. All of them need a look. The cost is not the true positive you eventually find. It is the hundreds of false positives you wade through to get there, and the analysts you lose to the wading. The Familiar works every alert at analyst depth, in seconds, with the reasoning shown and the verdict spread intact.

1

It picks up the alert

Soarcery ingests from your SIEM, EDR, or email security the moment an alert fires. No queue-watching required.

2

It plans, then investigates across your stack

The Familiar shows its plan first: the tools it will use and what it assumes. Then it pulls sender reputation, sign-in risk, endpoint telemetry, and ticket history, and keeps the evidence attached.

3

It scores the verdict spread

The native multi-engine spread shows where tools agree and disagree. A tight, confident spread drives the call.

4

It acts, or stops at the Seal

A clean spread auto-closes or auto-contains within your threshold. A contested spread routes to a human at the Seal, with the full evidence in hand.

The difference

The reasoning is shown, not hidden.

When triage is a black box, no one trusts it, so everything gets re-checked and you have automated nothing. Soarcery shows its work: the indicators it pulled, the tools it weighed, and the spread that drove the call. Analysts review a decision, not redo an investigation.

  • Auto-close the clean, auto-contain the obvious, escalate the contested to the Seal.
  • Consistent logic, so the verdict does not depend on who is on shift.
  • Every call replayable, with its evidence, for review or audit.
attachment: po-7741.docmMalicious
sandboxmalicious
static_avmalicious
ml_modelmalicious
reputationmalicious
confidence spread0.04 · auto-contain

Tight, agreeing spread → safe to act without a human

Use case · Phishing response

From reported phish to contained account.

The user clicked report, and the clock started. User-reported phishing is the highest-signal feed a SOC has and the most neglected, because every report costs a manual investigation whether it is a real campaign or a newsletter someone found suspicious. Soarcery picks the message up immediately: headers parsed, links and attachments detonated, the verdict spread scored, and the mailbox cleaned, with identity actions waiting at the Seal you control.

1

It picks up the report

The moment a user reports a message, the Familiar opens an investigation: full headers, body, links, and attachments, with the original preserved as evidence.

2

It detonates and enriches

Links and attachments are detonated and every indicator enriched. Sender history, infrastructure age, and lookalike checks land in the same thread.

3

It scores and scopes

The verdict spread makes the malicious call explicit. If it is a campaign, it finds every copy org-wide and checks click and sign-in activity for affected users.

4

It cleans up, gated where it bites

Quarantine and purge can run within your threshold. Identity actions, like revoking sessions or forcing a reset, wait at the Seal with the evidence attached.

investigation / reported-phish
0%recipients checked
0copies quarantined
0action at the Seal
mailbox cleansession revoke at the Seal

Product mock. Demo data.

The mailbox is the symptom. The account is the blast radius. Most phishing automation stops at search and purge; Soarcery treats the identity question as the real investigation: did the credential get used, from where, and does the session need to die right now. Those are the calls that deserve a human at the Seal, and they arrive there with the evidence already assembled.

Use case · Incident response

Contain fast. Improvise never.

When an investigation becomes an incident, the first hour disappears into timeline assembly and console hopping while the attacker keeps working. The moves that end an incident are decisions, but the team spends the opening stretch on archaeology. The Familiar does that part in minutes: scope, evidence, and proposed containment, with the irreversible moves held at the Seal for you.

1

Escalate the investigation

Any investigation can become an incident without switching tools. The thread, the evidence, and the verdict spread come along; nothing is re-gathered.

2

Scope the blast radius

The Familiar assembles the timeline and walks outward: which hosts, which accounts, which data was in reach. Every finding lands in the thread with its evidence cited.

3

Contain with the Seal

Low-regret moves can run within your thresholds. Irreversible or high-blast-radius actions stop at the Seal with the rationale attached, and either decision is recorded.

4

Remediate and recover

Resets, rebuilds, and re-enables run as sealed steps on the same trail. When it is over, the record of the incident already exists, in order, with who approved what.

The part that matters

The postmortem writes itself while you work.

Every agent finding, every human decision, and every action, taken or rejected, is appended to the investigation as it happens. The incident record is not a document someone writes after. It is the working surface itself, replayable end to end.

  • Chronological trail with evidence attached to every entry.
  • Seals recorded with who, when, and the rationale shown at the time.
  • The reasoning behind each conclusion is readable, not reconstructed.
By role

What it changes for you.

For the CISO

Coverage you can defend to the board and the auditor. Investigation runs on 100% of alerts, the line between what runs on its own and what waits at the Seal is explicit and set by your team, and every case closes with a replayable record of evidence, reasoning, cost, and the named human who sealed each consequential action.

For the SOC lead

You do not have a staffing problem, you have a queue problem. Routine work gets investigated and closed before the standup, and escalations arrive pre-worked: a finding, its confidence, the disagreement in the evidence, and a proposed Spell waiting at the Seal. Time-to-respond drops, backlog approaches zero, and the weekly report writes itself.

For the analyst

The grind goes to the machine; the craft stays with you. Cases arrive investigated, with the reasoning written to be read at 2am by someone tired and suspicious. You hold the Seal on the calls that need a human, and when you disagree with the Familiar you can show exactly where its reasoning went wrong. Supervising the machine is the senior role now.

For MSSPs and MDR providers

Service providers feel alert fatigue multiplied by every client they take on. Soarcery gives you agentic investigation you can run as a practice: per-engagement autonomy settings and Seals keep response inside the authority each client has actually granted you, and the decision trail gives you something defensible to hand them. The channel program is early and hands-on. Talk to us about it.

Start with one use case

See it on your real alerts.

Pick the workflow that hurts most. We will run it live in a 30-minute walkthrough, Seals and all.