See what your response actually catches.
So what does Soarcery do for breach and attack simulation? When a simulated technique fires an alert, the Familiar investigates and responds exactly as it would for a real one, so your BAS results measure the whole response, not just the detection.
BAS confirms a detection fired. It rarely shows what happens next.
Simulation tools are good at proving a technique triggered an alert. They stop short of showing whether the response that followed would have been fast, correct, and defensible, which is the part that actually matters in a real breach.
The simulated alert gets the real investigation loop.
It treats the simulated alert like a real one
The Familiar ingests it the moment it fires and works it at analyst depth, the same investigation loop it runs on every alert, no special-casing.
It shows the verdict and the plan
The multi-engine verdict spread and the proposed response are both visible, so you can see exactly where a real response would land, and why.
It stops at the same Seal it would in production
Consequential actions halt at the Seal with rationale and evidence attached, giving you a realistic measure of your actual response, not a simulated one.
See the response, not just the detection.
A 30-minute walkthrough. Run a simulated technique and watch the Familiar work it end to end.