Validate findings without re-fighting the investigation.
So what does Soarcery do for pen testing? Feed a finding into the same investigation loop that works every real alert, and get a replayable record of what your response would actually have caught.
A report proves a path in. It rarely proves what your SOC would have caught.
A pentest confirms an exploit worked. It does not usually show whether your detection and response would have found it, worked it correctly, and stopped it in time, so remediation debates happen without evidence either way.
Run the finding through the same loop as a real alert.
It investigates the finding like a real alert
Give the Familiar the entity or technique involved and it pulls the same context an analyst would: identity, endpoint, email, and cloud signals.
It shows the plan before it acts
The Familiar lays out what it would investigate, correlated against MITRE ATT&CK, so you can compare its plan against what the test actually did.
It hands you a receipt, not a guess
The output is a replayable record: what was detected, what was recommended, and exactly where the Seal would have stopped it, evidence attached.
Run your last finding through it.
A 30-minute walkthrough. Bring a recent finding and see what the response would have looked like.